SAUERS v. OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT et al
| PETER SAUERS |
| OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, ASHLEY MANAGEMENT CO., COUNTY BUILDERS, MIKE MEISTER and KEVIN RILLEY |
| 2:2023cv05146 |
| December 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Statement Rule 7.1 Disclosures by ASHLEY MANAGEMENT CO., COUNTY BUILDERS, MIKE MEISTER, OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, KEVIN RILLEY. (HARRIS, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by ASHLEY MANAGEMENT CO., COUNTY BUILDERS, MIKE MEISTER, OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, KEVIN RILLEY.Memorandum; Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(HARRIS, STEPHEN) |
| SUMMONS MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ASHLEY MANAGEMENT CO., COUNTY BUILDERS, MIKE MEISTER, OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and KEVIN RILLEY. Forwarded To: pro se plaintiff on 1/4/24. (mbh) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number 20016196 (rf, ) |
| PAPER #2 AND CONSENT FORM MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. (mbh) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against ASHLEY MANAGEMENT CO., COUNTY BUILDERS, MIKE MEISTER, OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and KEVIN RILLEY filed by PETER SAUERS. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP) (mbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
