OWENS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
STEPHEN OWENS |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCH CARNEY, LACOMBE, VETTER, T. DOMAN, BLAIR, CRAWFORD and R. CAMPBELL |
2:2023cv05165 |
December 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GENE EK PRATTER |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Clerks Office Response to Status Update (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 Docket Sheet, #4 Docket Sheet)(sbt) |
Filing 9 Request for Status Update dated 2/19/24 by STEPHEN OWENS (sbt) |
Filing 8 Clerks Office Response to Status Update (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(sbt) |
Filing 7 Request for Status Update dated 1/24/24 by STEPHEN OWENS (sbt) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by STEPHEN OWENS. (fdc) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by STEPHEN OWENS..(fdc) |
Filing 4 Letter dated 1/6/23 by STEPHEN OWENS (fdc) |
IFP Form Re-mailed to Stephen Owens. (fdc) |
|
DOC. NO. #2 MAILED TO PRO SE ON 1/3/24. (amas) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. (mbh) Modified on 1/2/2024 (tjd). |
Filing 1 Complaint against BLAIR, R. CAMPBELL, BLANCH CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CRAWFORD, T. DOMAN, LACOMBE and VETTER filed by STEPHEN OWENS. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP)(mbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.