ROSS-THOMPSON v. RELIANCE FAMILY CARE SERVICES, INC. et al
| LUVENIA ROSS-THOMPSON |
| RELIANCE FAMILY CARE SERVICES, INC. trading as RELIANCE FAMILY CARE doing business as RELIANCE FAMILY CARE, UWAYEMEN UWADIALE and REGAN ATAMAN |
| 2:2024cv00043 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LUVENIA ROSS-THOMPSON. REGAN ATAMAN waiver sent on 1/9/2024, answer due 3/11/2024; RELIANCE FAMILY CARE SERVICES, INC. waiver sent on 1/9/2024, answer due 3/11/2024; UWAYEMEN UWADIALE waiver sent on 1/9/2024, answer due 3/11/2024. (KARPF, ARI) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by SAMANTHA P. MARTIN on behalf of LUVENIA ROSS-THOMPSON (MARTIN, SAMANTHA) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by W. CHARLES SIPIO on behalf of LUVENIA ROSS-THOMPSON (SIPIO, W.) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to REGAN ATAMAN, RELIANCE FAMILY CARE SERVICES, INC., UWAYEMEN UWADIALE. EMAILED To: COUNSEL on 1/4/24. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against REGAN ATAMAN, RELIANCE FAMILY CARE SERVICES, INC., UWAYEMEN UWADIALE ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17169638.), filed by LUVENIA ROSS-THOMPSON.(KARPF, ARI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
