HOLLAND v. O'MALLEY
| WENDI L. HOLLAND |
| MARTIN J. O'MALLEY |
| 2:2024cv00121 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAMELA A CARLOS |
| GERALD A MCHUGH |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAMELA A. CARLOS TO HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 1/29/24. 1/29/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
| Filing 8 Social Security Declining Magistrate Consent by WENDI L. HOLLAND.. (rf, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ROBERT G. TARLOCK, ESQ., IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAMELA A. CARLOS ON 1/19/24.1/19/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er)
|
| Filing 6 Procedural Order 1/11/24 Entered and copies e-mailed. (mas) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT #2 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 3 OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY ACTIONS UNDER 42 U.S.C. 405(G) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA THE COURTS CASE MANAGEMENT/ELECTRONIC CASE FILES SYSTEM (CM/ECF), UPON: THE OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF COUNSEL, REGION III, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; AND THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. THE CLERKS OFFICE WILL ENSURE THAT CM/ECF NOTIFICATIONS INDICATING THAT THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED, AND SUMMONSES HAVE BEEN ISSUED, ARE SENT TO THE OFFICIAL EMAIL ADDRESSES DESIGNATED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AND THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAMELA A. CARLOS ON 1/11/24.1/11/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas)
|
| Filing 4 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Errata)(rf, ) |
| Service made electronically as to the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (mas) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 75 receipt number APAEDC-17183044.) filed by WENDI L. HOLLAND.Certificate of Service.(OSTERHOUT, KARL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by WENDI L. HOLLAND..(OSTERHOUT, KARL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, filed by WENDI L. HOLLAND. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(OSTERHOUT, KARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HOLLAND v. O'MALLEY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WENDI L. HOLLAND | |
| Represented By: | KARL E. OSTERHOUT |
| Represented By: | ROBERT G. TARLOCK, I |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
