COOK v. CARNEY et al
| JAMES M. COOK and JAMAR M. COOK |
| BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2 |
| 2:2024cv00314 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Notice To The Courts by JAMAR M. COOK (bw) |
| COPY OF DOC. NOS. 3, 4, AND 7 HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
Filing 7
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CORRECT THE DOCKET TO REFLECT THAT PLAINTIFFS NAME IS JAMAR M. COOK. COOKS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #1 IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IF COOK SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE SHALL, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT SHOWING ALL DEPOSITS, WITHDRAWALS, AND A CURRENT BALANCE, FROM ANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH HE WAS CONFINED DURING THE TIME PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2023 THROUGH JANUARY 22, 2024. ALTERNATIVELY, HE CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $405 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND $55 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF COOK IS ULTIMATELY GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE WILL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. HE WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO THE RETURN OF ANY PAYMENTS MADE TOWARD THE FEE. IF COOK FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 3/6/24.3/7/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(bw)
|
| Documents 3 and 4 re-mailed to JAMAR M. COOK on 3/6/24. (lisad, ) |
| Filing 6 Copy of Order/Notice dated 1/22/24 (Document # 3) and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to JAMES M. COOK for the following reason: NAME AND NUMBER DO NOT MATCH. (JL) (Main Document 6 replaced on 3/6/2024) (jl). |
| Filing 5 Copy of Order/Notice dated 1/25/24 (Document # 4) and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to JAMES M. COOK for the following reason: NAME AND NUMBER DO NOT MATCH. (jl) (Main Document 5 replaced on 3/6/2024) (jl). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING FAILED TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT, AS REQUIRED, PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS CANNOT BE ADJUDICATED AT THIS TIME. PLAINTIFF SHALL, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT. ALTERNATIVELY PLAINTIFF CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $405 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 1/25/24. 1/25/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(bw) Modified on 1/25/2024 (bw).
|
| COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, filed by JAMAR M. COOK.(bw) Modified on 3/6/2024 (lisad, ). |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JAMES M. COOK..(bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
