MARQUIS v. MANDILLO et al
SA'MONE MARQUIS |
NICK MANDILLO and INSPIRITEC, INC. |
2:2024cv00426 |
January 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOSHUA D WOLSON |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BLANK COMPLAINT FORM MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND MS. MARQUIS A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM TO BE USED BY A SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT FILING AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 2/22/24. 2/22/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 2/22/24. 2/22/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES (mbh) |
Filing 2 Complaint against INSPIRITEC, INC. and NICK MANDILLO filed by SA'MONE MARQUIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 EEOC Right to Sue Ltr, #3 Cover Letter) (mbh) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY SA'MONE MARQUIS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(mbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.