JOHNSON v. PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS et al
THEMA JOHNSON |
PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS, SAMUEL SANG-BUM LEE, JIM BROWN, LEONARD GREEN & PARTNERS, BENJASON RODRIGO NUNEZ, JONATHAN HARMON and SHAMLEEJAH AMESHA PATTERSON |
2:2024cv00494 |
January 31, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 2/9/24. 2/9/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw) |
COPY OF DOC. NOS. 6, 7 AND COMPLAINT FORM HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) (Main Document 5 replaced on 2/2/2024) (bw). |
Filing 4 Pro Se E-Notice Consent Form by THEMA JOHNSON consenting to e-notice at THEMAB.TJ@GMAIL.COM (bw) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by THEMA JOHNSON..(bw) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JIM BROWN, JONATHAN HARMON, SAMUEL SANG-BUM LEE, LEONARD GREEN & PARTNERS, BENJASON RODRIGO NUNEZ, SHAMLEEJAH AMESHA PATTERSON, PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS, filed by THEMA JOHNSON.(bw) Modified on 2/2/2024 (bw). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by THEMA JOHNSON..(bw) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by THEMA JOHNSON. (bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.