MATTHEWS et al v. BLINKEN
ERICA MATTHEWS and AUGUSTINE ACHEAMPONG |
ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary, U.S. Dept ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and JULIE STUFFT |
2:2024cv00649 |
February 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GERALD J PAPPERT |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (sg) |
Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by AUGUSTINE ACHEAMPONG, ERICA MATTHEWS. Exhibits to Complaint. (CREECH, TIMOTHY) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JULIE STUFFT, ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL on 2/14/2024. EMAILED TO US ATTORNEY WITH ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE. (sg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JULIE STUFFT, ANTONY BLINKEN ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17260059.), filed by ERICA MATTHEWS, AUGUSTINE ACHEAMPONG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK DESIGNATION FORM, #3 Designation Form)(CREECH, TIMOTHY) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/13/2024) (sbt). (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/13/2024) (sbt). (Attachment 3 replaced on 2/13/2024) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.