Taylor v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
| ANGIE TAYLOR |
| NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries L P, NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE INC., Novo Nordisk U S Commercial Holdings Inc and Novo Nordisk U S Holdings Inc |
| 2:2024cv00730 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Louisiana Western; Case Number 2:23-cv-01768. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MDL-3094 (Judge PRATTER) Member Case. WDLA 23-cv-01768. Case number in EDPA: 24-cv-730. (sbt) |
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER CTO # 1, directing transfer to Eastern District of Pennsylvania, In Re: Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) Products Liability Litigation, MDL # 3094. Record electronically transmitted to receiving court. Case Terminated. All future pleadings should be filed with the newly assigned court. (crt,Alexander, E) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 2/20/2024.]
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE received via email from Clerk of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transmitting Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1) in MDL No.3094, IN RE: Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) Products Liability Litigation advising case shall be transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania upon request of the record. (crt,Alexander, E) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 2/20/2024.] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY issued by the Clerk. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas P LeBlanc. Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay no longer assigned to case. All future filings should bear the name of the new judge assignment. Approved by Judge Terry A Doughty on 1/9/2024. (crt,Kiper, C) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 2/20/2024.] |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries L P, Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle Inc, Novo Nordisk U S Commercial Holdings Inc, Novo Nordisk U S Holdings Inc. (crt,Miletello, A) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 2/20/2024.] |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Miletello, A) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 2/20/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405, receipt number ALAWDC-5797287) filed by Angie Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ Novo Nordisk A/S, #3 Proposed summons/writ Novo Nordisk Inc, #4 Proposed summons/writ Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, #5 Proposed summons/writ Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries LP, #6 Proposed summons/writ Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle, #7 Proposed summons/writ Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings Inc, #8 Proposed summons/writ Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc)(Attorney Derrick Glenn Earles added to party Angie Taylor(pty:pla))(aty,Earles, Derrick) (Attachment 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 replaced with unfillable pdf on 12/19/2023) (Miletello, A). [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 2/20/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
