KAWAH v. TRADEALGO et al
JEBEH KAWAH |
TRADEALGO and WELLS FARGO BANK, NA |
2:2024cv00928 |
February 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
PAUL S DIAMOND |
Contract: Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO MOTION TO DISMISS, FILED BY JEBEH KAWAH. (amas) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by WELLS FARGO BANK, NA.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to Dismiss, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(PAYNE HARMON, RHONDA) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by RHONDA PAYNE HARMON on behalf of WELLS FARGO BANK, NA with Certificate of Service(PAYNE HARMON, RHONDA) |
|
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File Electronically, filed by JEBEH KAWAH. (va) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to TRADEALGO, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA. Forwarded To: Pro Se Plaintiff on 3/8/24. (va) Modified on 3/8/2024 (va). |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number 20018193 (sbt) |
|
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (amas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TRADEALGO, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, filed by JEBEH KAWAH.(FEE NOT PAID, NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 COVER PAGE)(amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.