BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| RA' SHEEN J BROWN |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS, CAROLYN NAYLOR, HUGH BURNS and JOHN OR JANE DOES #1-2 |
| 2:2024cv01019 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING SUBMITTED COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $405 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 3/14/2024. 3/14/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH BLANK IFP.(sg)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES MAILED TO BROWN (rf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HUGH BURNS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN OR JANE DOES #1-2, CAROLYN NAYLOR, SETH WILLIAMS, filed by RA' SHEEN J BROWN. *NO IFP FILED. NO FEE PAID*(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
