IN RE: DOMONIQUE JORDAN
| DOMONIQUE JORDAN |
| 2:2024cv01176 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL, ON OR BEFORE 4/22/24, EITHER PAY THE FILING FEE OR MOVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. WE MAY DISMISS THIS MATTER WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 3/20/24. 3/20/24 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (mbh)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES (mbh) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against DOMONIQUE JORDAN filed by DOMONIQUE JORDAN. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP) (mbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: IN RE: DOMONIQUE JORDAN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DOMONIQUE JORDAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
