HUBBARD v. LIVE! CASINO & HOTEL PHILADELPHIA et al
| DARRYL HUBBARD |
| LIVE! CASINO & HOTEL PHILADELPHIA, STADIUM CASINO RE, LLC, GAMING AND LEISURE PROPERTIES, INC. and THE CORDISH COMPANIES |
| 2:2024cv01364 |
| April 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOEL H SLOMSKY |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Berks County Sheriff re: served Complaint of Plaintiff upon Gaming and Leisure Prop Inc by Personal on 03/21/2024 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Sheriff Return of Service)(BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 2 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(nd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GAMING AND LEISURE PROPERTIES, INC., STADIUM CASINO RE, LLC, LIVE! CASINO & HOTEL PHILADELPHIA, THE CORDISH COMPANIES (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17369970), filed by GAMING AND LEISURE PROPERTIES, INC., STADIUM CASINO RE, LLC, LIVE! CASINO & HOTEL PHILADELPHIA, THE CORDISH COMPANIES. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DISCLOSURE STATMENT, #2 Designation Form DESIGNATION FORM, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #4 Exhibit COMPLAINT IN PHILADELPHIA CCP, #5 Exhibit AFFIDAVIT, #6 Exhibit MEMO OF LEASE)(KRAMER, ANDREW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
