HUANG v. JADDOU et al
| GUI HUA HUANG |
| UR M. JADDOU, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO and MERRICK B. GARLAND |
| 2:2024cv01418 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOEL H SLOMSKY |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: US ATTY on 4/4/24 (amas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by GUI HUA HUANG re Attorney Required Forms, Designation Form (HENRY, TODD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17376549.), filed by GUI HUA HUANG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Designation Form)(HENRY, TODD) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Civil Box was not checked off. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
