MARTE v. B.O.P. et al
| JOSE MIGUEL MARTE |
| B.O.P., I.C.E. and SUPERIOR COURT, NJ |
| 2:2024cv01516 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT PETITIONER HAVING FILED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 2241 WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEE OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND FURTHER RECOGNIZING THAT THE PETITIONER HAS FAILED TO USE THE COURTS STANDARD FORM, A BLANK COPY OF THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A PETITION 2241 ALONG WITH THIS ORDER WILL BE MAILED TO PETITIONER. IF PETITIONER MUST WITHIN 30 DAYS PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. PETITIONER SHALL ALSO COMPLETE THE PETITION FORM, SIGN AND RETURN TO THE COURT. IF PETITIONER FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE PETITION MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 4/19/24. 4/19/24 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (mbh)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JOSE MIGUEL MARTE.(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
