NOVOTNY v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC et al
| CHRISTINE M. NOVOTNY |
| PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC and KELLY EHRICH |
| 2:2024cv01532 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of Order #4 and IFP Form mailed to Novotny. (fdc) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $405 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 4/18/24. 4/18/24 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va) Modified on 4/18/2024 (va).
|
| Docs. 2 & 3 mailed to Novotny. (fdc) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT FORM TO RECEIVE E-NOTIFICATIONS. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KELLY EHRICH, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC, filed by CHRISTINE M. NOVOTNY. FEE NOT PAID. NO IFP.(va) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
