DOE v. MILLER et al
| JANE DOE |
| MICHAEL MILLER and JOHN DOE |
| 2:2024cv02019 |
| May 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN F MURPHY |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Request by Pro Se Plaintiff Jane Doe For Redaction of Complaint. (Attachments: #1 COVER SHEET)(DT) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF JANE DOE TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. (Attachments: #1 COVER SHEET)(dt) |
Filing 4
ORDERED: 1. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DI 1) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUFFICIENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO ALLOW THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER SHE HAS THE MEANS TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. 2. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND PLAINTIFF AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER OF THIS CASE. ETC.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN F MURPHY ON 5/31/2024.5/31/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED WITH IFP APPLICATION AND E-MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, MICHAEL MILLER, filed by JANE DOE. (Attachments: #1 COVER LETTER)(sg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JANE DOE..(sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
