STOKES v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
| NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURER'S INSURANCE COMPANY |
| Mark Stokes |
| BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ TREJO |
| 2:2024cv02127 |
| May 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN F MURPHY |
| Contract: Insurance |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of New Jersey; Case Number 2:24-cv-01088. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (ld, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa: Telephone Conference held on 5/16/2024. Order to be filed. (spc) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
Filing 9
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion to enforce [D.E. 1] and this matter be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(f); that Plaintiff shall promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company and Respondent Bernardo Rodriguez Trejo by regular and overnight mail; that the Clerk of Court shall (i) terminate the motion at D.E. 1, (ii) mark this matter CLOSED, and (iii) effectuate the transfer of this action, forthwith, consistent with this Order.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa on 5/16/2024. (ld, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.]
|
| Filing 8 Letter from Counsel for Plaintiff. (CULLETON, CHRISTOPHER) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by MARK STOKES re 6 Order,, 05/02/2024 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(CULLETON, CHRISTOPHER) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER -- The Court will hold a telephonic conference on May 16, 2024, at 11:30 a.m., to be joined by dialing 973-437-5535, access code 101 080 843#. On or before May 13, 2024, Petitioner shall file a letter (limited to 3 pages; 1.5 line spacing) addressing why the Court should not transfer the pending motion to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where the underlying action is pending, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(f). Counsel for Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order on all parties forthwith and file proof of service no later than May 6, 2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa on 5/2/2024. (spc) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.]
|
| Pro Hac Vice fee: $250.00, receipt number NEW50151 as to MATTHEW J. MCELVENNY. (ps) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Matthew J. McElvenny, Esq.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa on 4/2/2024. (ld, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.]
|
| Filing 4 Proposed Order by MARK STOKES re #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas to Appear for Deposition and Produce Documents ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ANJDC-15115133.). (CULLETON, CHRISTOPHER) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| Filing 3 Proposed Order by MARK STOKES re #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . (CULLETON, CHRISTOPHER) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 4/15/2024 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - A proposed form of order was not submitted with #2 the motion for leave to appear pro hac vice submitted by Christopher J. Culleton on 3/13/2024. PLEASE SUBMIT THE MISSING DOCUMENT(S) ONLY. (sm) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by MARK STOKES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Statement from MJM in support of PHV, #2 Exhibit Verified Statement from Sponsor for PHV)(CULLETON, CHRISTOPHER) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa added. (ps) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| Set Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas to Appear for Deposition and Produce Documents ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ANJDC-15115133.). Motion set for 3/18/2024 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas to Appear for Deposition and Produce Documents ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ANJDC-15115133.), filed by MARK STOKES. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Exhibit Ex. A, #4 Exhibit Ex. B, #5 Exhibit Ex. C, #6 Exhibit Ex. D, #7 Exhibit Ex. E, #8 Exhibit Ex. F, #9 Exhibit Ex. G, #10 Exhibit Ex. H)(CULLETON, CHRISTOPHER) [Transferred from New Jersey on 5/17/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
