CAIRNES v. UNUM GROUP
KATHLEEN CAIRNES |
UNUM GROUP also known as UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA doing business as UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
2:2024cv02162 |
May 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE by KATHLEEN CAIRNES (Completed Designation Form) (COHEN, FAYE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNUM GROUP A/K/A D/B/A UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17481346.), filed by KATHLEEN CAIRNES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Designation Form Case Designation Form, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(COHEN, FAYE) (Attachment 6 replaced on 5/21/2024) (sbt). |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. The Yes/No questions and Certification question asking if the case is/is not related have to be answered. A signature is also needed. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.