JONES v. SYMONETTE et al
| ELAINE JONES |
| BOISE BUTLER, JAMILLA HASBEN, JOHN BURLESON, DAVE SAUNDERS and ALLAN A. SYMONETTE |
| 2:2024cv02249 |
| May 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDERED THAT: 1. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. 2. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. 3. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. JONES MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN AUGUST 12, 2024. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. 5.THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND JONES A BLANK COPY OF THE COURTS FORM COMPLAINT TO BE USED BY A SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT FILING AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 7/11/2024.7/11/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH BLANK COMPLAINT.(sg)
|
| DOC. 3 AND E-CONSENT MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. NOT MAILED TO PRO SE WITH E-CONSENT.(sg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JOHN BURLESON, BOISE BUTLER, JAMILLA HASBEN, DAVE SAUNDERS, ALLAN A. SYMONETTE, filed by ELAINE JONES.(sg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ELAINE JONES..(sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
