PASSARELLA v. WILLIAMS et al
WILLIAM J. PASSARELLA |
C/O WALTON, SGT. SERODY, CORRECTION OFFICER V. HILTON and WARDEN LAURA WILLIAMS |
2:2024cv03256 |
July 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GERALD A MCHUGH |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
COPY OF DOC. NO. 4 AND IFP APPLICATION HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING SUBMITTED COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $405 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 7/25/24. 7/25/24 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh) |
PAPER #2 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
Filing 3 Letter dated 07/19/2024 Re: Copy Work Request (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Office Response)(pjm) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES (mbh) |
Filing 1 Complaint against V. HILTON, SGT. SERODY, WALTON and LAURA WILLIAMS filed by WILLIAM J. PASSARELLA. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP) (mbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.