GUO v. THE HONORABLE UR M. JADDOU et al
QIONG GUO |
THE HONORABLE MERRICK B. GARLAND, THE HONORABLE ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO and THE HONORABLE UR M. JADDOU |
2:2024cv04216 |
August 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KAI N SCOTT |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to JACQUELINE C. ROMERO, THE HONORABLE ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, THE HONORABLE MERRICK B. GARLAND, THE HONORABLE UR M. JADDOU, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: pro se plaintiff on 8/15/24. (E-MAILED TO AUSA) (mbh) |
Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES (mbh) (Main Document 5 replaced on 8/15/2024) (mbh). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to THE HONORABLE ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, THE HONORABLE MERRICK B. GARLAND, THE HONORABLE UR M. JADDOU, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: pro se plaintiff on 8/15/24. (E-MAILED TO AUSA) (mbh) |
Filing 3 Pro Se E-Notice Consent Form by QIONG GUO consenting to e-notice at qiggpa@gmail.com (mbh) |
Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number 20022620 (mbh) |
Filing 1 Complaint against THE HONORABLE ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, THE HONORABLE MERRICK B. GARLAND, THE HONORABLE UR M. JADDOU, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO filed by QIONG GUO. (mbh) Modified on 8/15/2024 (mbh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.