Zhou v. GEICO Secure Insurance Company
Lai Zhou |
GEICO Secure Insurance Company |
2:2024cv04859 |
September 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CHAD F KENNEY |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER THAT AFTER REVIEW OF THE DOCKET AND IT BEING ALLEGED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL (ECF NO. 1, PAGE 8) THAT THIS COURT HAS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THIS CASE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1332, AND BECAUSE THERE IS DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP BETWEEN THE PARTIES, EACH PARTY TO THE ACTION IS REQUIRED AND ORDERED TO FILE OF RECORD THEIR DISCLOSURE OF CITIZENSHIP IN DIVERSITY JURISDICTION CASES (FORM ATTACHED), BY 12:00 P.M. ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 18, 2024.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 9/13/2024. 9/13/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT IT APPEARING TO THE COURT THAT DEFENDANT HAS NOT FILED THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT REQUIRED BY FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AT THE TIME OF FILING ITS FIRST APPEARANCE, DEFENDANT IS HEREBY ORDERED TO FILE ITS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT BY 12:00 P.M. ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 18, 2024.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 9/13/2024. 9/13/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE REMOVING DEFENDANT SHALL, ON ECF, ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 14, 2024.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 9/13/2024. 9/13/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
Filing 2 ORDERED THAT COUNSEL CONTEMPLATING FILING A MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6), (E), OR (F), SHALL FIRST CONTACT OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONTEMPLATED MOTION AND TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE ANY ALLEGED PLEADING DEFICIENCIES OR STRIKE CERTAIN MATTER. THIS CONFERENCE SHALL TAKE PLACE AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS BEFORE THE FILING OF THE MOTION.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 9/13/2024. 9/13/2024 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GEICO Secure Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17741049), filed by GEICO Secure Insurance Company.(Griffith, Kylie) |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. DEFENDANT's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. The Yes/No questions have to be answered. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Zhou v. GEICO Secure Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GEICO Secure Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Kylie Griffith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lai Zhou | |
Represented By: | STEVEN GILLMAN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.