HARPER v. GOURLEY et al
Petitioner: ROGER HARPER
Respondent: MICHAEL GOURLEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2024cv05331
Filed: October 3, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO
Referring Judge: PAMELA A CARLOS
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE A SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER TO THE CLAIMS IN THE HABEAS PETITION AND A SUPPORTING LEGAL MEMORANDUM, WITHIN FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PURSUANT TO RULE 5 FOL. 28 U.S.C. 2254. ALL STATE COURT OPINIONS AND RELEVANT RECORDS MUST BE ATTACHED AS EXHIBITS. THE CLERK FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, AND POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS, AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. HARPER, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, CP-51-CR-0000416-2016, WITHIN FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PETITIONER MAY FILE A REPLY WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF SERVICE OF THE ANSWER. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAMELA A. CARLOS ON 10/9/24. 10/9/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas)
October 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT CASE IS REFERRED TO HONORABLE PAMELA A. CARLOS FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 10/8/24. 10/8/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO HARPER. *COPY EMAILED TO PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL*(rf, )
October 3, 2024 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES (rf, )
October 3, 2024 Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 20023993 (rf, )
October 3, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 20023993.), filed by ROGER HARPER.(rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARPER v. GOURLEY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL GOURLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROGER HARPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?