TAYLOR v. BENT
Plaintiff: SHANAY TAYLOR
Defendant: JAMEELAH BENT
Case Number: 2:2024cv05532
Filed: October 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M RUFE
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2024 Filing 2 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(sbt)
October 17, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JAMEELAH BENT (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17817807), filed by JAMEELAH BENT. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Disclosure of Citizenship in Diversity, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(BROOKS, ALBERT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TAYLOR v. BENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMEELAH BENT
Represented By: ALBERT J. BROOKS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHANAY TAYLOR
Represented By: AGOSTINO CAMMISA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?