SWINT v. DISH NETWORK et al
Plaintiff: ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Defendant: DISH NETWORK, VERIZON LLC, DIRECTV and AT&T INC
Case Number: 2:2025cv00921
Filed: February 19, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MARK A KEARNEY
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2025 COPY OF DOC. NO. 4 HAS BEEN MAIED TO PRO SE. (bw)
March 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT WE DISMISS THIS MATTER WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DIRECT THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 3/25/25. 3/25/25 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PROSE.(rf, )
February 24, 2025 Document 3 and IFP Application mailed to: Robert James Swint. (DT)
February 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order that Plaintiff shall, on or before March 21, 2025, either: (1) pay $405 (the $350 filing fee and $55 administrative fee) to the Clerk of Court, or (2) move to proceed in forma pauperis;2. The Clerk of Court shall send this Order to Plaintiff along with a copy of the appropriate non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis, bearing the civil action number of this case. Plaintiff may use this form to seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis if he cannot afford to pay the fees to commence this case;1 and,3. We may dismiss this matter without further notice if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this Order.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 2/21/25. 2/21/25 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (rf, )
February 21, 2025 Copy of Pro Se Guidelines Notice (#2) mailed to Swint. (fdc)
February 19, 2025 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (Attachments: #1 E CONSENT)(rf, )
February 19, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T INC, DIRECTV, DISH NETWORK, VERIZON LLC, filed by ROBERT JAMES SWINT. *NO IFP. NO FEE PAID*(rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SWINT v. DISH NETWORK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DISH NETWORK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VERIZON LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DIRECTV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?