SCHOFFSTALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA
| BRIAN KENNETH MILLER and BRIAN SCHOFFSTALL |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA |
| 2:2026cv01549 |
| March 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Clerks Office Response to Status Update (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(pjm) |
| Filing 11 Request for Status Update dated 04/20/2026 by BRIAN SCHOFFSTALL (pjm) |
| DOCS. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 10 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg) |
Filing 10
ORDER THAT IT APPEARING THAT THE COURTS FILINGS IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE ARE BEING RETURNED AS UNDELIVERABLE1 BECAUSE PLAINTIFF FILED THE CASE UNDER AN ALIAS NAME, BRIAN KENNETH MILLER, BUT IS LISTED ON THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (DOC) WEBSITE AS BRIAN SCHOFFSTALL (SEE ECF NO. 9), IT IS ORDERED THAT: THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO CHANGE THE CAPTION IN THIS CASE AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS ALSO DIRECTED TO SEND SCHOFFSTALL A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND RESEND SCHOFFSTALL THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ECF NOS. 4, 6, 7, AND 8, AT THE FOLLOWING: BRIAN SCHOFFSTALL, AKA BRIAN KENNETH MILLER QR-2518 SCI-SOMERSET 1590 WALTERS MILL ROAD SOMERSET, PA 15510-0001. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 4/15/2026. 4/15/2026 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg)
|
| Filing 9 Copy of Notice dated 3/9/26 (Document # 4) and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to BRIAN KENNETH MILLER for the following reason: RETURN TO SENDER; NAME AND NUMBER DO NOT MATCH. (sg) |
| DOCS. 7 AND 8 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg) |
|
Filing 8
ORDERED THAT: 1. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. 2. BRIAN KENNETH MILLER, #QR-2518, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE. THE COURT DIRECTS THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET OR OTHER APPROPRIATE OFFICIAL TO ASSESS AN INITIAL FILING FEE OF 20% OF THE GREATER OF (A) THE AVERAGE MONTHLY DEPOSITS TO MILLERS INMATE ACCOUNT; OR (B) THE AVERAGE MONTHLY BALANCE IN MILLERS INMATE ACCOUNT FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE FILING OF THIS CASE. 3. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET. 4. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. 5. MILLERS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(II) FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. 6. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 4/10/2026. 4/10/2026 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. EMAILED TO SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET.(sg)
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 4/10/2026. 4/10/2026 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg) |
| Filing 6 Clerks Office Response to Status Update (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(pjm) |
| Filing 5 Request for Status Update dated 04/03/2026 by BRIAN SCHOFFSTALL (pjm) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by BRIAN KENNETH MILLER. (bw) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA, filed by BRIAN KENNETH MILLER.(bw) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by BRIAN KENNETH MILLER..(bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
