SOW v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff: MAMADOU Y. SOW
Defendant: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Case Number: 2:2026cv06621
Filed: September 2, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: TIMOTHY J SAVAGE
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2026 Filing 3 Notice re: Availability of Court-Annexed Mediation (sbt)
September 2, 2026 Filing 2 Opt In Notice of Procedure to Consent to Random Magistrate Judge Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent)(sbt)
September 2, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TEMPLE UNIVERSITY ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-19607918.), filed by MAMADOU Y. SOW.(KARPF, ARI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SOW v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAMADOU Y. SOW
Represented By: ARI RISSON KARPF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?