LADA v. DELAWARE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE et al
KAREN LADA |
DELAWARE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CLAYTON RAILEY and VIRGINIA CARTER |
5:2008cv04754 |
October 3, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Lancaster |
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
HENRY S. PERKIN |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 23, 2009, PLAINTIFF SHALL MAKE A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT OF HER FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION CLAIM IN COUNT I PURSUAN T TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(e), OR PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION CLAIM MAY BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIMS IN COUNT I ARE DISMISSED AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNT I IS DISMISSED AGAINST DEFENDANT DELAWARE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNTS IV, V, VI, AND VII OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED IN THEIR EN TIRETY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS SHALL HAVE UNTIL NOVEMBER 12, 2009 TO ANSWER PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/30/09. 10/1/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.