ECKMAN et al v. LANCASTER CITY et al
IVY JO ECKMAN, ADRIAN SANCHEZ and ALTHEA SANCHEZ |
LANCASTER CITY, C. LUCIANO, JOSEPH GRAZCYK, JAMES FATTA and DAMON GREATHOUSE |
5:2008cv05454 |
November 19, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lancaster |
THOMAS M. GOLDEN |
ARNOLD C. RAPOPORT |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT POLICE OFFICER DAMON GREATHOUSE IS DENIED CONCERNING THE CLAIMS AGAINST HIM BY PLAI NTIFF IVY JO ECKMAN IN THE CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT FOR FALSE ARREST (COUNTS I AND V), MALICIOUS PROSECUTION (COUNTS IV AND V), PUNITIVE DAMAGES (COUNT VII) AND ATTORNEYS' FEES (COUNT VIII). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL CLAIMS IN THE CIVIL ACTIO N COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFFS IVY JO ECKMAN, ADRIAN SANCHEZ AND ALTHEA SANCHEZ ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST DEFENDANTS LANCASTER CITY, POLICE OFFICER C. LUCIANO, POLICE OFFICER JOSEPH GRACZYK AND POLICE OFFICER JAMES FATTA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLAIMS IN THE CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIF IVY JO ECKMAN AGAINST DEFENDANT POLICE OFFICER DAMON GREATHOUSE FOR FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE (COUNT III) ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/30/2010. 9/30/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(lbs, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.