HOBSON v. ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District HOBSON v. ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK

HOBSON v. ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK

Plaintiff:	PETER HOBSON
Defendant:	ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK
Case Number:	5:2008cv05652
Filed:	December 5, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
County:	Lehigh
Presiding Judge:	JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
Presiding Judge:	HENRY S. PERKIN
Nature of Suit:	Both
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 10, 2010	Filing 26 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DIS MISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION SEEKING ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 8/9/10. 8/11/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
September 28, 2009	Filing 16 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MORE SPECIFIC AMENDED COMPLAINT, CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION, ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 23, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DISMISSED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR DEFENDANT TO RE-FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AT THE CLOSE OF DISCOVERY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/28/09. 9/28/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 10, 2010

Filing 26 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DIS MISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION SEEKING ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 8/9/10. 8/11/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

September 28, 2009

Filing 16 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MORE SPECIFIC AMENDED COMPLAINT, CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION, ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 23, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DISMISSED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR DEFENDANT TO RE-FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AT THE CLOSE OF DISCOVERY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/28/09. 9/28/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOBSON v. ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: PETER HOBSON
Represented By:	DONALD P. RUSSO
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK
Represented By:	DAVID M. STECKEL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?