JACOBY v. BETHLEHEM SUBURBAN MOTOR SALES
WARREN JACOBY |
BETHLEHEM SUBURBAN MOTOR SALES |
5:2009cv05661 |
November 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Northampton |
THOMAS M. GOLDEN |
ARNOLD C. RAPOPORT |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 25) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 5/16/2011. 5/18/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JACOBY v. BETHLEHEM SUBURBAN MOTOR SALES | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: WARREN JACOBY | |
Represented By: | ADAM DAVID MESHKOV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BETHLEHEM SUBURBAN MOTOR SALES | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.