PEROZA-BENITEZ v. LAWLER et al
| JOSE ANTONIO PEROZA-BENITEZ |
| RAYMOND ,/ LAWLER and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 5:2010cv03684 |
| July 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Berks |
| THOMAS M. GOLDEN |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER THAT THE COURT'S ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING JUDGE RUETER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 , IS AFFIRMED. PETITIONER'S OBJECTION TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 , IS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/23/11. 9/23/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IS APROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITIONFOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS NOT GRANTED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/2/11. 3/3/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )
|
|
Filing
10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE COURT RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE DENIED AND THAT NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY BE ISSUED. PETITIONER MAY FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. FAILURE TO FILE TIMELY OBJECTIONS MAY CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF APPELLATE RIGHTS. OBJECTIONS TO R&R DUE BY 2/28/2011. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 2/8/11. 2/9/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
