FEINSTEIN et al v. ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL & HEALTH NETWORK OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
| STEVEN J. FEINSTEIN and ALBERT P. SARNO |
| ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL & HEALTH NETWORK OF PENNSYLVANIA, ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA, ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL & HEALTH NETWORK PENSION PLAN and ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN |
| 5:2010cv04050 |
| August 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lehigh |
| LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS (DOC.#27) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE DEFENDANTS ARE AWARDED ATTORNEYS' FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,672. THE DEFENDANTS ARE AWARDED COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $139.07. THE DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR AN UPWARD ADJUSTMENT IN THE LODESTAR IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/25/12. 9/25/12 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[fdc]
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 10/19/11. 10/20/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
