DOSS v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
| DARNELL DOSS |
| LANCASTER COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, PETER KINSLEY, LANCASTER COUNTY MAGISTRATE DISTRICT COURT, CHRISTOPHER LARSEN, LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, JOHN BURKHART, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, KAREN MANSFIELD, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MARK WALMER, BARRY GOLDMAN and DOUGLAS CODY |
| 5:2011cv00178 |
| January 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lancaster |
| MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF SHALL PAY THE $350.00 FILING FEE. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS EXCEPT THE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE AND SERGEANT/DETECTIVE JOHN BURKHART ARE DISMISSED PU RSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915(e). THE COMPLAINT IS TO BE FILED AGAINST DEFENDANTS LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE AND SERGEANT/DETECTIVE JOHN BURKHART, THE SUMMONSES ARE TO ISSUE, SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT IS TO BE MADE UPON THE DEFENDANTS BY THE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE IN THE EVENT THAT WAIVER OF SERVICE IS NOT EFFECTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF S.C.I. GREENE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/22/11. 6/23/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND WARDEN OF S.C.I. GREENE. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
