RESH et al v. BROSNAC et al
| RONALD RESH and VALERIE RESH |
| ANDREW BROSNAC, CALIFORNIA CREDIT UNION and REALTY CONCEPTS |
| 5:2011cv01924 |
| March 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Berks |
| JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
| Other Statutes: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCUMENT 41) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIS ACTION IN AN APPROPRIATE JURISDICTION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 2/5/2016. 2/5/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT REALTY CONCEPTS TO STRIKE AND OR SET ASIDE I S DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS SHALL HAVE UNTIL APRIL 30, 2012 TO SERVE ORIGINAL PROCESS UPON DEFENDANT REALTY CONCEPTS AND TO FILE PROOF OF SUCH SERVICE. FAILURE TO PROPERLY SERVE AND FILE PROOF OF SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE W ITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 4(M) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION OF REALTY CONCEPTS TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR REALTY CONCEPTS TO RE-FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS IF PLAINTIFFS PERFECT AND FILE PROOF OF SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 3/29/12. 3/30/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
