STOLZTFUS v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: JOHN F. STOLZTFUS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 5:2011cv06056
Filed: September 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE MEMORANDUM OF LAW FILED ON THIS SAME DAY THAT THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY'S DECISION IS REVERSED AND THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION WILL WAIVE THE RECOVERY OF THE OVERPAYMENT TO PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 5/1/13. 5/2/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STOLZTFUS v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN F. STOLZTFUS
Represented By: RICHARD J. GROMEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?