BRIDGES v. ASTRUE et al
| CHARLES BRIDGES |
| MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, JASPER J. BEDE, JANET LANDESBURG and REANA SWEENEY |
| 5:2012cv02316 |
| April 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Lancaster |
| JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR REARGUMENT, ECF NO. 63, IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT II OF PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 65, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED C OMPLAINT, ECF NO. 68, IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S THIRD MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR DECLARATORY ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DIRECTED TO THE DEFENDANT, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ECF NO. 87, IS DENIED AS MOOT. THIS CASE IS CLOSED SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/30/15. 10/1/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS SHALL HAVE UNTIL 4/21/14 TO FILE AN ANSWER TO COUNT II OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 3/28/14. 3/28/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
