WILLIAMSON v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
MATTHEW WILLIAMSON |
TODD BUSKIRK, MICHAEL BATEMAN and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON |
5:2012cv02333 |
April 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Northampton |
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER THAT: PLFF'S "MOTION OF FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT" IS GRANTED. PLFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THIS COURT'S MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 7/10/12. 7/12/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(fb) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF SHALL PAY THE $350.00 FILING FEE. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. PLAINTIFF IS G IVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNITL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLEKR SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. THIS CASE SHALL BE MARKED CLOSEDD FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/9/12. 5/10/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND FAXED TO WARDEN. (jpd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.