HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
| HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION |
| 5:2012cv06033 |
| October 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage |
| Defendant |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | CHARLES SCOTT TOOMEY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | PO FU CHENG |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
