CHARLES v. UPS NATIONAL LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN et al
MARVIN CHARLES |
UPS NATIONAL LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
5:2012cv06223 |
November 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lancaster |
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES 46 AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE 47 , IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF MARVIN CHARLES IS AWARDED $27,055.00 IN ATTORNEY'S FEES AND $475.76 IN COSTS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 5/22/17. 5/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gs) |
Filing 43 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED ON COUNT I ONLY. THE PARTIES SHALL HAVE 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO SUBMIT BRIEFING ON COUNT II OF THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 10/29/2015. 10/30/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, ) |
Filing 27 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO QUASH IS DENIED. THE DEPOSITION OF DANIELLE CALDWELL MAY PROCEED IN ACCORD WITH THE NOTICE OF DEPOSITION ISSUED ON 9/13/2013. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 11/19/2013. 11/19/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.