CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION et al v. SEBELIUS et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION et al v. SEBELIUS et al

CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION et al v. SEBELIUS et al

Plaintiff:	CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION, NORMAN HAHN, NORMAN LEMAR HAHN, ANTHONY H. HAHN, ELIZABETH HAHN and KEVIN HAHN
Defendant:	KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA SOLIS, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Movant:	THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
Case Number:	5:2012cv06744
Filed:	December 4, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Allentown Office
County:	Lancaster
Presiding Judge:	MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2013	Filing 50 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 7 , THE RESPONSE THERETO, AND THE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF FILED BY THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION 38 , AND FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/11/13. 1/11/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2013

Filing 50 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 7 , THE RESPONSE THERETO, AND THE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF FILED BY THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION 38 , AND FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/11/13. 1/11/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION et al v. SEBELIUS et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION
Represented By:	CHARLES W. PROCTOR, III
Represented By:	RANDALL LUKE WENGER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: NORMAN HAHN
Represented By:	CHARLES W. PROCTOR, III
Represented By:	RANDALL LUKE WENGER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: NORMAN LEMAR HAHN
Represented By:	CHARLES W. PROCTOR, III
Represented By:	RANDALL LUKE WENGER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTHONY H. HAHN
Represented By:	CHARLES W. PROCTOR, III
Represented By:	RANDALL LUKE WENGER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH HAHN
Represented By:	CHARLES W. PROCTOR, III
Represented By:	RANDALL LUKE WENGER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KEVIN HAHN
Represented By:	CHARLES W. PROCTOR, III
Represented By:	RANDALL LUKE WENGER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Represented By:	MICHELLE RENEE BENNETT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: HILDA SOLIS
Represented By:	MICHELLE RENEE BENNETT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: TIMOTHY GEITHNER
Represented By:	MICHELLE RENEE BENNETT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Represented By:	MICHELLE RENEE BENNETT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Represented By:	MICHELLE RENEE BENNETT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Represented By:	MICHELLE RENEE BENNETT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Movant: THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By:	BRIGITTE AMIRI
Represented By:	MARY CATHERINE ROPER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Movant: THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
Represented By:	BRIGITTE AMIRI
Represented By:	MARY CATHERINE ROPER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?