SCHIMENTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. JOHNSON et al

Plaintiff: SCHIMENTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: MARK A. JOHNSON and GREENFIELD ARCHITECTS, LTD.
Case Number: 5:2013cv02101
Filed: April 19, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Allentown Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCHIMENTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. JOHNSON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SCHIMENTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
Represented By: ELIZABETH R. LEONG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK A. JOHNSON
Represented By: GLEN D. KIMBALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GREENFIELD ARCHITECTS, LTD.
Represented By: MATTHEW CHABAL, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.