KOKINDA v. COLEMAN et al
JASON KOKINDA |
BRIAN COLEMAN, KATHLEEN KANE and JAMES B. MARTIN |
5:2013cv02202 |
April 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lehigh |
JAN E. DUBOIS |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 167 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION UNDER 28 USC, SECTION 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY FILED BY PRO SE PETITIONER, JASON KOKINDA, IS DENIED AND DISMISSED; THE OBJECTIONS TO THE R & R FILED BY PETITIONER JASON KOKINDA ARE OVERRULED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH BELOW; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE CASE CLOSED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 5/24/17. 5/25/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED TO PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL. (pr, ) |
Filing 69 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION UNDER 28 USC, SECTION 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY IS STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE UNTIL PETITIONER HAS EXHAUSTED HIS STATE REMEDIES; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE R & R ARE OVERRULED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/18/14. 7/15/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.