SHUKER et al v. SMITH & NEPHEW, PLC et al
WALTER SHUKER and VIVIAN SHUKER |
SMITH & NEPHEW, PLC and SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. |
5:2013cv06158 |
October 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Berks |
JUAN R. SANCHEZ |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 106 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 102 ), IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS' THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 9/29/2016. 9/29/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) |
Filing 99 MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/13/2015. 8/13/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) |
Filing 89 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 66 ), IS GRANTED. THE PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT E TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION SHALL BE DEEMED FILED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D THAT DEFENDANT SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 59 ), IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. PLAINTIFFS SHALL HAVE UNTIL 4/30/2015 TO FILE A FURTHER AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/31/2015. 4/1/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.