THE PINE CREEK VALLEY WATERSHED ASSOC. et al v. THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
| THE PINE CREEK VALLEY WATERSHED ASSOC., RAYMOND PROFFITT FOUNDATION, THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER C/O JOHN WILMER, ESQ. |
| THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY and SHAWN GAVIN |
| 5:2014cv01478 |
| March 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Berks |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NOS. 45-46, 50) ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/28/15. 9/28/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER/OPINION THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AS FOLLOWS: a. THE CLAIM ARISING UNDER TO CLEAN WATER ACT, 33 U.S.C. 1251-1388, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION; AND b. THE CLAIM ARISING UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT, 5 U.S.C. 701-706 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. THE OUTSTANDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NOS 32, 35, 36) ARE DENIED AS MOOT; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 3/17/15. 3/17/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
