RIVERA v. URBAN et al
CARMEN RIVERA |
JOHN URBAN, SCOTT REYNOLDS, ERIC NEWHALL, MICHAEL DAILEY, ANGEL RODRIGUEZ and CLINE |
5:2014cv03883 |
June 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Northampton |
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE CONCERNING ALPHIE HERRERAS DRUG USE IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF ALPHIE HERRERAS USE OF ILLEGA L DRUGS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY CONCERNING ALPHIE HERRERA, SR.S PRIOR DRUG USE IS ADMISSIBLE ONLY IN THE DAMAGES PORTION OF THIS BIFURCATED TRIAL.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE CONCERNING PRIOR CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS/BAD ACTS IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE CONCERNING PRIOR CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS/BAD ACTS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED THAT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY CONCERNING PRIOR CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE OPINION ACCOMPANYING THIS ORDER IS ADMISSIBLE ONLY IN THE DAMAGES PORTION OF THIS BIFURCATED TRIAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY OF OTHER INMATE DEATHS AND SUITS INVOLVING LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE OTHER INMATE DEATHS AND SUITS INVOLVING LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL IS GRANTED CONCERNING THE DEATHS OF INMATES TRAVIS MAGDITCH AND JOAN SAMUELS, AND DENIED CONCERNING THE DEATH OF INMATE DAVID CAMPBELL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY CONCERNING THE DEATH OF DAVID CAMPBELL WHILE AN INM ATE AT LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON IS ADMISSIBLE IN BOTH THE LIABILITY AND DAMAGES PHASES OF THIS BIFURCATED TRIAL.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY AS TO TRAINING PROVIDED AFTER FEBRUARY 27, 2013 IS D ENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY CONCERNING TRAINING PROVIDED TO PRISON STAFF BY DEFENDANT LEHIGH COUNTY AFTER FEBRUARY 27, 2013 CONCERNING RESTRAINT OF MEDICALLY COMPROMISED PRISONERS IS ADMISSIBLE IN BOTH THE LIABILITY AND D AMAGES PHASES OF THIS BIFURCATED TRIAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF, WHICH MOTION WAS FILED SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 (DOCUMENT 66), IS GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS D IRECTED TO FILE DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY AS TO TRAINING PROVIDED AFTER FEBRUARY 27, 2013, WHICH IS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF, FILED SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 (DOCUMENT 66). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF, WHICH MOTION WAS FILED SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 (DOCUMENT 68), IS GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS D IRECTED TO FILE DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY AS TO OTHER INMATE DEATHS AND SUITS INVOLVING LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, WHICH IS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF, FILED SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 (DOCUMENT 68).. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 12/2/2015. 12/3/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.