ROBERTS v. SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER et al
APRIL ROBERTS |
SPRUCE MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER, NORTHERN HEALTH FACILITIES, INC., EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., JASON AUGE and BETSY ROBLES |
5:2014cv04338 |
July 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lancaster |
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
Other Contract |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 19 ), IS GRANTED. THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 5 ), IS DENIED. THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. 6 ), IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF 039;S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOR REOCNSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 25 ), IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND SHALL FORWARD THE FILE TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 2/22/2016. 2/22/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. 6 ), IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 5 ), IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR DEFAMATION MAY PROCEED. DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE THEIR ANSWER WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 8/12/2015. 8/13/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.