FRITZINGER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. - LOCAL 177, I.B.T. MULTI-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT PLAN
KENNETH FRITZINGER |
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. - LOCAL 177, I.B.T. MULTI-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT PLAN |
5:2014cv05927 |
October 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Northampton |
EDWARD G. SMITH |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: FRITZINGER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. - LOCAL 177, I.B.T. MULTI-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT PLAN | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KENNETH FRITZINGER | |
Represented By: | WILLIAM HRONIS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. - LOCAL 177, I.B.T. MULTI-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT PLAN | |
Represented By: | AMY COVERT |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.