MUFFLEY v. CAMERON et al
WILLIAM JOHN MUFFLEY |
CAMERON, THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA |
5:2015cv00152 |
January 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Clearfield |
C. DARNELL JONES |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDERED AS FOLLOWS THE R&R ECF NO. 12 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION AND AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ECF NOS. 1 , 3 ARE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; PETITIONERS OBJECTIONS (ECF NO. 18 ARE OVERRULED; AND, THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 5/18/20. 5/18/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd,) |
Filing 15 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MAKR THIS MATTER CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 1/10/18. 1/11/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.